July 2, 2024

Section 19 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Determination of rules of procedure (1) The arbitral tribunal shall not be bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872). (2) Subject to this Part, the parties are free to agree on the procedure to be followed by the arbitral tribunal in conducting its proceedings. (3) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (2), the arbitral tribunal may, subject to this Part, conduct the proceedings in the manner it considers appropriate. (4) The power of the arbitral tribunal under sub-section (3) includes the power to determine the admissibility, relevance, materiality and weight of any evidence.

Section 19 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 Read More »

Section 17 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Interim measures ordered by arbitral tribunal (1) A party may, during the arbitral proceedings [***], apply to the arbitral tribunal— (i)   for the appointment of a guardian for a minor or person of unsound mind for the purposes of arbitral proceedings; or (ii)   for an interim measure of protection in respect of any of the following matters, namely:— (a)   the preservation, interim custody or sale of any goods which are the subject matter of the arbitration agreement; (b)   securing the amount in dispute in the arbitration; (c)   the detention, preservation or inspection of any property or thing which is the subject-matter of the dispute in arbitration, or as to which any question may arise therein and authorising for any of the aforesaid purposes any person to enter upon any land or building inthe possession of any party, or authorising any samples to be taken, or any observation to be made, or experiment to be tried, which may be necessary or expedient for the purpose of obtaining full information or evidence; (d)   interim injunction or the appointment of a receiver; (e)   such other interim measure of protection as may appear to the arbitral tribunal to be just and convenient, and the arbitral tribunal shall have the same power for making orders, as the court has for the purpose of, and in relation to, any proceedings before it. (2) Subject to any orders passed in an appeal under section 37, any order issued by the arbitral tribunal under this section shall be deemed to be an order of the Court for all purposes and shall be enforceable under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), in the same manner as if it were an order of the Court.]

Section 17 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 Read More »

Section 16 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Competence of arbitral tribunal to rule on its jurisdiction (1) The arbitral tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction, including ruling on any objections with respect to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement, and for that purpose,— (a)   an arbitration clause which forms part of a contract shall be treated as an agreement independent of the other terms of the contract; and (b)   a decision by the arbitral tribunal that the contract is null and void shall not entail ipso jure the invalidity of the arbitration clause. (2) A plea that the arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction shall be raised not later than the submission of the statement of defence; however, a party shall not be precluded from raising such a plea merely because that he has appointed, or participated in the appointment of, an arbitrator. (3) A plea that the arbitral tribunal is exceeding the scope of its authority shall be raised as soon as the matter alleged to be beyond the scope of its authority is raised during the arbitral proceedings. (4) The arbitral tribunal may, in either of the cases referred to in sub-section (2) or sub-section (3), admit a later plea if it considers the delay justified. (5) The arbitral tribunal shall decide on a plea referred to in sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) and, where the arbitral tribunal takes a decision rejecting the plea, continue with the arbitral proceedings and make an arbitral award. (6) A party aggrieved by such an arbitral award may make an application for setting aside such an arbitral award in accordance with section 34.

Section 16 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 Read More »

Section 15 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Termination of mandate and substitution of arbitrator (1) In addition to the circumstances referred to in section 13 or section 14, the mandate of an arbitrator shall terminate— (a)   where he withdraws from office for any reason; or (b)   by or pursuant to agreement of the parties. (2) Where the mandate of an arbitrator terminates, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed according to the rules that were applicable to the appointment of the arbitrator being replaced. (3) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where an arbitrator is replaced under sub-section (2), any hearings previously held may be repeated at the discretion of the arbitral tribunal. (4) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, an order or ruling of the arbitral tribunal made prior to the replacement of an arbitrator under this section shall not be invalid solely because there has been a change in the composition of the arbitral tribunal.  

Section 15 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 Read More »

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Appeals

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Appeals

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) came into existence to reduce the traffic of cases in the High Courts in India. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal hears income tax appeals from taxpayers against orders passed by the Income Tax Authorities. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was established in January 1941 and has 63 benches across India.  Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is a quasi-judicial authority to file appeals against the orders of income tax authorities. A tax appeal can be filed by a taxpayer who does not agree with the assessment order or any other order, passed by an income-tax authority. An appeal before the ITAT is generally filed by the taxpayer to contest any order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals). Similarly, an income-tax department can also file an appeal against any order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) before the ITAT What is Income Tax Appellate Tribunal? (ITAT) The income tax Appellate Tribunal is a quasi judicial body that hears income tax appeals from Taxpayers, who do not agree with any order passed by the Income Tax Authority. ITAT also, hears appeals from the Income Tax Authorities against the order passed by the subordinate Income Tax Authorities. It was set up in January 1941 and specialized in dealing with matters relating to direct taxes. The ITAT functions under the regulation of the jurisdictional High Court and is assistant to the High Court. The ITAT is also the final fact-finding authority, and its decisions are final on factual matters. The ITAT consists of different benches for different regions, each having an accountant member and a judicial member. The President of the ITAT constitutes a bench from among the members of the ITAT. In some cases, a special bench with three or more members may be constituted to dispose of income tax appeals. What are the Functions of ITAT? The primary function of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is to hear income tax appeals from taxpayers and the income tax authorities; it is the second forum after the Commissioner of Income Tax. The orders passed by the ITAT are final unless a substantial question of law arises for determination by the High Court. The ITAT is headed by a President, who is appointed by the Central Government. The ITAT aims to provide speedy and inexpensive justice to taxpayers and the revenue department. What are the powers of the ITAT? Power to restore the appeal: The ITAT can recall any order passed by it if it is satisfied that it was passed under a mistake of fact or law or in ignorance of any material fact. Power to recall the Order: The ITAT can recall the order if it is believed that there was enough cause for the non-appearance of the appellant or his authorized representative. Power of Remand: The ITAT can remand a case to the income tax authority for fresh adjudication or further inquiry if it considers it necessary or expedient for the ends of justice. Power to restore ex-parte order: The ITAT can restore an ex-parte order passed by it, if it is believed that there was sufficient cause for the absence of the party when the order was passed. Power of Rectification: The ITAT can rectify any mistake apparent from the record in any order passed by it, either on its own motion or on an application made by any party. Power to punish for contempt: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has the power to punish for contempt of its orders under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971. Which are the Appealable Orders? The orders passed by the Assessing Officer. Any Penalty order passed by the Commissioner The orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] The orders passed by the Assessing Officer as per the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel(DRP) Any orders passed by the jurisdictional Commissioner. Application for a stay on recovery of demands of tax. Any other Applications for recall of orders. Monetary Limits Applicable to the Filing of Appeals The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) can issue orders, instructions or directions to the income-tax authorities. The CBDT can also fix the monetary limits to regulate the filing of appeal or application or reference to the ITAT, jurisdictional High Court or Supreme Court. The CBDT vide instruction no. 17/2019 dated 8 August 2019 has fixed the monetary limit for filing appeals by the income tax department before the ITAT, High Courts or Supreme Courts which as follows: Before the ITAT – Rs.50 lakh. Before the High Court – Rs.1 crore. Before the Supreme Court – Rs.2 crore. The monetary limits are for the tax effect in a particular case. ‘Tax effect’ refers to the difference between the tax on the assessed income and tax on the income without the assessment adjustments, which is also called the returned income. An Assessing Officer should determine the tax effect for each assessment year for a taxpayer. Though the above are the monetary limits for filing appeals, one should check the merits of the case before submitting a request. How to file an appeal before the ITAT? Prepare a form of appeal in Form No. 36 and a form of memorandum of cross-objections in Form No. 36A. You can download these forms from the ITAT website or obtain them from the ITAT registry. Pay the prescribed fee for filing the appeal. The fee depends on the amount of tax disputed and whether you are an individual or a company. You can pay the fee by demand draft or online through the ITAT website. Submit four copies of the memorandum of appeal, statement of facts, fee receipt, and other relevant documents to the ITAT registry within 60 days from the date of receipt of the order appealed against. You must also serve a copy of the appeal and documents to the respondent, i.e., the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) whose order is challenged. After verifying your appeal, the ITAT will assign a number to it and notify you of the date and

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Appeals Read More »

Section 14 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Failure or impossibility to act (1) The mandate of an arbitrator shall terminate [and he shall be substituted by another arbitrator,] if— (a)   he becomes de jure or de facto unable to perform his functions or for other reasons fails to act without undue delay; and (b)   he withdraws from his office or the parties agree to the termination of his mandate. (2) If a controversy remains concerning any of the grounds referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1), a party may, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, apply to the Court to decide on the termination of the mandate. (3) If, under this section or sub-section (3) of section 13, an arbitrator withdraws from his office or a party agrees to the termination of the mandate of an arbitrator, it shall not imply acceptance of the validity of any ground referred to in this section or sub-section (3) of section 12.

Section 14 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 Read More »

Section 13 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Challenge procedure (1) Subject to sub-section (4), the parties are free to agree on a procedure for challenging an arbitrator. (2) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (1), a party who intends to challenge an arbitrator shall, within fifteen days after becoming aware of the constitution of the arbitral tribunal or after becoming aware of any circumstances referred to in sub-section (3) of section 12, send a written statement of the reasons for the challenge to the arbitral tribunal. (3) Unless the arbitrator challenged under sub-section (2) withdraws from his office or the other party agrees to the challenge, the arbitral tribunal shall decide on the challenge. (4) If a challenge under any procedure agreed upon by the parties or under the procedure under sub-section (2) is not successful, the arbitral tribunal shall continue the arbitral proceedings and make an arbitral award. (5) Where an arbitral award is made under sub-section (4), the party challenging the arbitrator may make an application for setting aside such an arbitral award in accordance with section 34. (6) Where an arbitral award is set aside on an application made under sub-section (5), the Court may decide as to whether the arbitrator who is challenged is entitled to any fees.

Section 13 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 Read More »

Section 12 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Grounds for challenge (1) When a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator, he shall disclose in writing any circumstances,— (a)   such as the existence either direct or indirect, of any past or present relationship with or interest in any of the parties or in relation to the subject matter in dispute, whether financial, business, professional or other kind, which is likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality; and (b)   which are likely to affect his ability to devote sufficient time to the arbitration and in particular his ability to complete the entire arbitration within a period of twelve months. Explanation 1.—The grounds stated in the Fifth Schedule shall guide in determining whether circumstances exist which give rise to justifiable doubts as to the independence or impartiality of an arbitrator. Explanation 2.—The disclosure shall be made by such person in the form specified in the Sixth Schedule.] (2) An arbitrator, from the time of his appointment and throughout the arbitral proceedings, shall, without delay, disclose to the parties in writing any circumstances referred to in sub-section (1) unless they have already been informed of them by him. (3) An arbitrator may be challenged only if— (a)   circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality, or (b)   he does not possess the qualifications agreed to by the parties. (4) A party may challenge an arbitrator appointed by him, or in whose appointment he has participated, only for reasons of which he becomes aware after the appointment has been made. [(5) Notwithstanding any prior agreement to the contrary, any person whose relationship, with the parties or counsel or the subject matter of the dispute, falls under any of the categories specified in the Seventh Schedule shall be ineligible to be appointed as an arbitrator: Provided that parties may, subsequent to disputes having arisen between them, waive the applicability of this sub-section by an express agreement in writing.]

Section 12 – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 Read More »

Section 11A – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Power of Central Government to amend Fourth Schedule (1) If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary or expedient so to do, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, amend the Fourth Schedule and thereupon the Fourth Schedule shall be deemed to have been amended accordingly. (2) A copy of every notification proposed to be issued under sub-section (1), shall be laid in draft before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in disapproving the issue of the notification or both Houses agree in making any modification in the notification, the notification shall not be issued or, as the case may be, shall be issued only in such modified form as may be agreed upon by the both Houses of Parliament.]

Section 11A – Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 Read More »