CA Bhuvnesh Goyal

DPIIT Takes Up Startups Concerns with FinMin

Services of B K Goyal & Co LLP Income Tax Return Filing | Income Tax Appeal | Income Tax Notice | GST Registration | GST Return Filing | FSSAI Registration | Company Registration | Company Audit | Company Annual Compliance | Income Tax Audit | Nidhi Company Registration| LLP Registration | Accounting in India | NGO Registration | NGO Audit | ESG | BRSR | Private Security Agency | Udyam Registration | Trademark Registration | Copyright Registration | Patent Registration | Import Export Code | Forensic Accounting and Fraud Detection | Section 8 Company | Foreign Company | 80G and 12A Certificate | FCRA Registration |DGGI Cases | Scrutiny Cases | Income Escapement Cases | Search & Seizure | CIT Appeal | ITAT Appeal | Auditors | Internal Audit | Financial Audit | Process Audit | IEC Code | CA Certification | Income Tax Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) | Income Tax Notice u/s 142(1) | Income Tax Notice u/s 144 |Income Tax Notice u/s 148 | Income Tax Demand Notice  The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) has raised, with the finance ministry, issues related to startups’ concerns over the calculation of their fair market valuation, and the Budget proposal to include foreign investors under the ambit of the so-called angel tax that till now applied only to Indian residents.Officials said talks were ongoing with the departments of revenue and economic affairs to address the concerns, as startups raise funds based on their market valuation but that also increases their tax liability. “We are talking to the revenue department and the department of economic affairs. Talks are ongoing,” said an official.Startups are valued at a price higher than the fair market value (FMV) as their investors look at liquidation preferences and other balancing rights.This discussion comes amid declining investment for startups, especially after the collapse of California-based Silicon Valley Bank, which was crucial to the startup ecosystem.As per the latest ‘Tracxn Geo Qu-arterly Report: India Tech Q1 2023’ report, the startup ecosystem in India saw a considerable decline in investment in the first quarter of 2023 compared with the same period in 2018.In the budget 2023-24, the government proposed to include foreign investors under the ambit of the angel tax that was applicable to Indian residents. It will become effective April 1, 2024. Angel tax is levied on unlisted companies when they issue shares at a price that exceeds the FMV. The difference is then taxed at 20% or more.Besides being an additional burden from a regulatory perspective, startups fear that the move will push investors away. Source: Economic Times – 13/04/2023

DPIIT Takes Up Startups Concerns with FinMin Read More »

StartUps grew 300 times in last 9 years

Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) Science & Technology; Minister of State (Independent Charge) Earth Sciences; MoS PMO, Personnel, Public Grievances, Pensions, Atomic Energy and Space, Dr Jitendra Singh said here today that StartUps in India grew 300 times in the last 9 years. Dr Jitendra Singh was speaking at a function at Rashtrapati Bhavan where “National Innovation Awards”, instituted by the Union Ministry of Science & Technology, were presented to “Grassroot Innovators” by the President of India, Droupadi Murmu. The Minister said that there were just around 350 StartUps before 2014, but after Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave the clarion call from the ramparts of the Red Fort in his Independence Day address and rolled out special StartUp scheme in 2016, there has been a quantum jump in StartUps to more than 90,000 with more than 100 Unicorns. Dr Jitendra Singh further added that simultaneously Prime Minister Modi opened up the Space sector for private participation leading to more than 100 StartUps in the Space sector within just about three years. Similarly, Biotech StartUps went up from around 50 to nearly 6,000, he said. Dr Jitendra Singh said that India had no dearth of talent, capability, innovation and creativity in the youth, but they were lacking a favourable milieu and proper patronage from the political leadership which was provided by Prime Minister Modi, and it is also now evident that we have so much of innovative talent even in our rural youth and there is no linkage between formal education degree and innovation capabilities which is evident from the awards given today. He added that this issue was also sought to be addressed by Prime Minister Modi by bringing in National Education Policy 2020 which gives emphasis to skill and not only to the academic degrees and prepares the individual for earning livelihood according to his or her aptitude and skill. The Minister mentioned that the nature of the awards given today and the profile of the awardees proves that a large number of “Grassroot Innovators” are available in India who may not have a very high formal education but who are capable of creating success stories and also generating attractive means of livelihoods for themselves. Dr Jitendra Singh appreciated the efforts of the Department of Science and Technology and National Innovation Foundation (NIF) for organising the “Festival of Innovation & Entrepreneurship” (FINE) and noted that it is a unique effort to promote Science, Technology and Innovation even among those who may not be highly educated in the formal sense or may have not even be science students but who possess inherent talent and inborn aptitude for innovation and entrepreneurship, which also may become a source of livelihood for them. The awards were presented in different categories, namely national level, State level and student category. Two of the recipients today had already been awarded Padma Shri for their innovations. 10 APR 2023 2:40PM by PIB Delhi

StartUps grew 300 times in last 9 years Read More »

Sagarmala Innovation and Start up Policy

Draft ‘Sagarmala Innovation and Start-up Policy’ issued for Stakeholder Consultation Draft Policy aims to harness new technology developed by Indian Start-ups and entrepreneurs PM Narendra Modi termed startups as “backbone” of new India, continuing the same spirit through this policy, MoPSW is taking initiatives to promote start-ups through creativity and innovation: Shri Sarbananda Sonowal 10 APR 2023 4:35PM by PIB Delhi A nation’s growth is augmented by start-ups and entrepreneurs. In order to build a strong innovation ecosystem, the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways (MoPSW) issued draft on ‘Sagarmala Innovation and Start-up Policy’. This draft policy aims at nurturing start-ups and other entities to co-create the future of India’s growing maritime sector. This entails intensive collaboration of the organizations to build a strong eco-system facilitating innovation and Startups in the country that will drive sustainable growth and generate large scale employment opportunities. This enhances the cooperation and coordination between academic institutions, public sector, private sector and convergence of different schemes and programs to groom fresh ideas and approaches to resolve the issues and challenges to boost up the efficiency in the areas of operation, maintenance, and infrastructure development. Shri Sarbananda Sonowal, Union Minister, MoPSW stated: “the start-up India policy is the brainchild of PM Modi and this is the right step taken by MoPSW to create a strong ecosystem for fostering start-ups and innovation in the nation. This will surely promote innovation and entrepreneurship. Through this policy, MoPSW wants to enable start-ups to grow and prosper through innovations” The designed framework enables the distribution of responsibilities and benefits among the various stakeholders. This is not only limited to the existing stakeholders but also includes upcoming young entrepreneurs with innovative ideas. Draft policy has identified several key areas for the startup to flourish including decarbonization, optimizing processes through data, maritime education, multi-modal transportation, manufacturing, alternate/ advance materials, maritime cybersecurity, smart communication and marine electronics. Details of draft ‘Sagarmala Innovation and Start-up Policy’: Digital Portal based selection of startups ensuring a transparent process Grants to create a minimum viable product/ services (MVP), commercialization of proprietary technology including market entry or scaling up Creation of ‘Launch pads’ at Ports for carrying out trials, facilitating pilot projects, establishing working space and adopting products and solutions Annual Start-up Awards in the maritime sector recognizing distinguished efforts of innovation Organizing Buyer-Seller Meetings and providing Technical Knowledge Support for VCs Guidance to Non Registered Start-ups and Individuals with promising ideas in Maritime Sector including registration of start-up and availing Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) recognition Regulatory support in Tenders and Sub-contracting Legal and accountancy back up to start-ups for IP-Patent filing, Company registration, annual filings and closures The promotion of start-ups shall be through development of Maritime Innovation Hubs (MIH) which shall perform the following functions: Develop incubators and accelerators with state of the art facilities to cover all aspects of the startup journey from idea to scaled product. Develop centralized repository containing all pertinent information to assist emerging entrepreneurs Attract investment for eligible start-up businesses and innovative maritime technology Entrepreneur development through ‘know-how’ sessions about the various aspects of the maritime industry and launching of innovation focused programs Collaborate with national & international stakeholders for mentorship, knowledge sharing and facilitate access to global subject matter experts, serial entrepreneurs, business leaders, and investors with the potential to get their entry and scaling in the India MoPSW feels proud to share that over the span of 8 successful years of Sagarmala, maritime sector has captured all the possible opportunities for the port-led development. Now, this policy will also create a field to establish a long-term action plans, network, infrastructure, and other resources to build a robust maritime innovation ecosystem.

Sagarmala Innovation and Start up Policy Read More »

Procedure for no deduction of income tax

Procedure, format and standards for filling an application in Form No. 15C or Form No. 15D for grant of certificate for no-deduction of income-tax under sub-section (3) of section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 through TRACES-. F.No. Pro DGIT(S)CPC(TDS)/NOTIFICATION/2022-23 Notification No. 01/2023 New Delhi, 29th March, 2023 Section 195(3) ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961 provides for grant of certificate to a person entitled to receive interest or other sum on which income tax is to be deducted under section 195(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 without deduction of tax at source. For the purpose, an application has to be made by the person to the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as “AO”) in the prescribed form.  Rule 29B of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 prescribes the rules for making application for certificate authorising receipt of interest and other sums without deduction of tax in such cases. Rule 29B(3) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 provides that the application shall be made by a banking company or insurer in Form No. 15C and by any other person who carries on business or profession in India through a branch in Form 15D.  In exercise of the powers delegated by the Central Board of Direct Taxes under sub-rule (1) of Rule 131 ofthe Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Director General of Income-tax (Systems) hereby specifiesa. Form No. 15C and Form No. 15D prescribed under Rule 29B(3) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for electronic furnishing at TRACES website under digital signature or through electronic verification code; and b. the procedure, format and standards for the purpose of electronic filing of Form No. 15C and Form No. 15D and generation of certificate under sub-section (3) of section 195 of Income-tax Act, 1961, through TRACES in the succeeding paragraphs which will be applicable from 01.04.2023 Procedure for filling of application in Form No. 15C or Form No. 15D shall be as follows:  For making an application in Form No. 15C or in Form lSD, the banking company or insurer or, as the case may be, any other person who carries on business or profession in India through a branch the taxpayer shall login into the TRACES website (www.tdscpc.gov.in)for making the application electronically for grant of certificate under section 195(3) ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961 for authorising receipt of interest and other sums without deduction of tax.  The applicant who is not registered at TRACES website shall have to first register with its Permanent Account Number (‘PAN”) at TRACES (www.tdscpc.gov.in) for login and filling application in Form No. 15C or Form No. 15D. Detailed procedure for registration can be accessed through the link https://contents.tdscpc.gov.in/en/e-tutorial-taxpayer.html   4.3 The applicant shall login at TRACES website (www.tdscpc.gov.in) and submit Form No. 15C or Form No. 15D along with supporting documents using any of the following: (i) Digital Signature, (ii) Electronic Verification Code, (iii) AADHAR based Authentication, (iv) Mobile OTP.  4.4 Applicants accessing TRACES website from outside of India shall login at TRACES website (www.nriservices.tdscpc.gov.in) and submit application in Form No. 15C or Form No. 15D along with supporting documents using Digital Signature only.  4.5 The applicant can track the status of the application through option ‘Track Request for Form 13/15C/15D under the tab ‘Statements/Forms’.  5. Procedure for assignment of application to the TDS ADs in the International Taxation charges:  5.1 The application will be assigned to the TDS AO in the International Taxation charges on the basis of details furnished by the applicant in Form No. 15C or Form No. 15D. Such applications can be accessed by the AO through the path ‘Lower/No Deduction Certificate> Generate Certificate>Certificate u/s 195(3) and select ‘Open Request (s)’.  5.2 Once the application in Form No. 15C or Form No. 15D has been successfully submitted, the following data will be obtained by CPC(TDS): (i) Processed data of Income Tax Returns of previous 6 financial years (if available). (ii) PAN Demand. (iii) E-filed Income-Tax Returns of previous 6 financial years. (iv) Audit Report / Form 3CD (if applicable) of previous 6 financial years. (v) Assessment Orders of previous 6 financial years (if available).  5.3 The applications shall be aSSigned by default to the DClT/ACIT (IntI. Taxn.) exercising jurisdiction over TDS matters. However, if the jurisdiction orders are otherwise, the assigned AO can transfer the applications to the AO concerned on AO Portal.  6. Processing of the Taxpayer’s! Oeductee’s request by the AD, Range Heads and Commissioners of Income-tax: 6.1 Role of ADs: The AO shall process the application through TRACES -AO Portal after login using their credentia Is.  6.1.1 By navigating through the path ‘LowerlNo Deduction Certificate>Generate Certificate> Certificate us/195(3) and select ‘Open Request (5)’. the AD will be able to access the following information: (i) Information furnished by the tax-payer/Deductee. (ii) Documents submitted by the tax-payer/Deductee. (iii) Information essential for processing the request in respect of the tax-payer/Deductee received from other modules. (iv) Information essential for processing the request in respect ofthe tax-payer/Deductee, as available at CPC(TDS).  6.1.2 If the AD requires any further information or documents or clarification from the applicant for arriving at a decision, the same shall be obtained online using the option /(Seek Clarification” available within the functionality through the path (TDS AD login->LowerINo Deduction Certificate->Certificate uls 195(3)->Open Request->Request Number->Seek Clarification).  6.1.3 The query raised by the AD shall be forwarded to the applicant through systems for furnishing a suitable response. The query will be available to the applicant in the inbox at TRACES Portal through the applicant’s login through the path (Tax Payer login -> StatementIForms-> Track Request Form 13115Cl1SD->Status>Clarification required by AD).  6.1.4 The response submitted by the applicant shall be visible to the AD within the functionality for taking a decision on the application through the path (TDS AD login->LowerINo Deduction Certificate->Certijicate uls 195(3)-> Open Request-> Request Number->Communication History->Comments)  6.1.5 The AD shall approve/reject the application based on the parameters defined in rule 29B of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 as well as any other instructions/guidelines in this regard.  6.1.6 After approval! rejection of the application, as the case may be, it

Procedure for no deduction of income tax Read More »

Income deemed to be received under section 7 of Income Tax Act 1961

 The following incomes shall be deemed to be received in the previous year :—   (i) the annual accretion in the previous year to the balance at the credit of an employee participating in a recognised provident fund, to the extent provided in rule 6 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule ;  (ii) the transferred balance in a recognised provident fund, to the extent provided in sub-rule (4) of rule 11 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule ; (iii) the contribution made, by the Central Government or any other employer in the previous year, to the account of an employee under a pension scheme referred to in section 80CCD.

Income deemed to be received under section 7 of Income Tax Act 1961 Read More »

Residence in India under section 6 of Income Tax Act 1961

For the purposes of this Act,— (1) An individual is said to be resident in India in any previous year, if he— (a) is in India in that year for a period or periods amounting in all to one hundred and eighty-two days or more ; or (b) [***] (c) having within the four years preceding that year been in India for a period or periods amounting in all to three hundred and sixty-five days or more, is in India for a period or periods amounting in all to sixty days or more in that year. Explanation 1.—In the case of an individual,— (a) being a citizen of India, who leaves India in any previous year as a member of the crew of an Indian ship as defined in clause (18) of section 3 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 1958), or for the purposes of employment outside India, the provisions of sub-clause (c) shall apply in relation to that year as if for the words “sixty days”, occurring therein, the words “one hundred and eighty-two days” had been substituted ; (b) being a citizen of India, or a person of Indian origin within the meaning of Explanation to clause (e) of section 115C, who, being outside India, comes on a visit to India in any previous year, the provisions of sub-clause (c) shall apply in relation to that year as if for the words “sixty days”, occurring therein, the words “one hundred and eighty-two days” had been substituted 30[and in case of 31[such person] having total income, other than the income from foreign sources, exceeding fifteen lakh rupees during the previous year, for the words “sixty days” occurring therein, the words “one hundred and twenty days” had been substituted.] Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this clause, in the case of an individual, being a citizen of India and a member of the crew of a foreign bound ship leaving India, the period or periods of stay in India shall, in respect of such voyage, be determined in the manner and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.32 33[(1A) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (1), an individual, being a citizen of India, having total income, other than the income from foreign sources, exceeding fifteen lakh rupees during the previous year shall be deemed to be resident in India in that previous year, if he is not liable to tax in any other country or territory by reason of his domicile or residence or any other criteria of similar nature.] 34[Explanation.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that this clause shall not apply in case of an individual who is said to be resident in India in the previous year under clause (1).] (2) A Hindu undivided family, firm or other association of persons is said to be resident in India in any previous year in every case except where during that year the control and management of its affairs is situated wholly outside India. (3) A company is said to be a resident in India in any previous year, if—  (i) it is an Indian company; or (ii) its place of effective management, in that year, is in India. Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause “place of effective management” means a place where key management and commercial decisions that are necessary for the conduct of business of an entity as a whole are, in substance made. (4) Every other person is said to be resident in India in any previous year in every case, except where during that year the control and management of his affairs is situated wholly outside India. (5) If a person is resident in India in a previous year relevant to an assessment year in respect of any source of income, he shall be deemed to be resident in India in the previous year relevant to the assessment year in respect of each of his other sources of income. (6) A person is said to be “not ordinarily resident” in India in any previous year if such person is— (a) an individual who has been a non-resident in India in nine out of the ten previous years preceding that year, or has during the seven previous years preceding that year been in India for a period of, or periods amounting in all to, seven hundred and twenty-nine days or less; or (b) a Hindu undivided family whose manager has been a non-resident in India in nine out of the ten previous years preceding that year, or has during the seven previous years preceding that year been in India for a period of, or periods amounting in all to, seven hundred and twenty-nine days or less 35[; or (c) a citizen of India, or a person of Indian origin, having total income, other than the income from foreign sources, exceeding fifteen lakh rupees during the previous year, as referred to in clause (b) of Explanation1 to clause (1), who has been in India for a period or periods amounting in all to one hundred and twenty days or more but less than one hundred and eighty-two days; or (d) a citizen of India who is deemed to be resident in India under clause (1A). Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, the expression “income from foreign sources” means income which accrues or arises outside India (except income derived from a business controlled in or a profession set up in India)] 36[and which is not deemed to accrue or arise in India].

Residence in India under section 6 of Income Tax Act 1961 Read More »

Assessment of income of any other person under section 153C of Income Tax Act 1961

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, section 147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,— (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, a person other than the person referred to in section 153A, then, the books of account or documents or assets, seized or requisitioned shall be handed over to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person and that Assessing Officer shall proceed against each such other person and issue notice and assess or reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or requisition is made and for the relevant assessment year or years referred to in sub-section (1) of section 153A : Provided that in case of such other person, the reference to the date of initiation of the search under section 132 or making of requisition under section 132A in the second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 153A shall be construed as reference to the date of receiving the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person : Provided further that the Central Government may by rules30 made by it and published in the Official Gazette, specify the class or classes of cases in respect of such other person, in which the Assessing Officer shall not be required to issue notice for assessing or reassessing the total income for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or requisition is made and for the relevant assessment year or years as referred to in sub-section (1) of section 153A except in cases where any assessment or reassessment has abated. (2) Where books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned as referred to in sub-section (1) has or have been received by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person after the due date for furnishing the return of income for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted under section 132 or requisition is made under section 132A and in respect of such assessment year— (a)  no return of income has been furnished by such other person and no notice under sub-section (1) of section 142 has been issued to him, or (b) a return of income has been furnished by such other person but no notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 has been served and limitation of serving the notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 has expired, or (c)  assessment or reassessment, if any, has been made, before the date of receiving the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person, such Assessing Officer shall issue the notice and assess or reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153A. 31[(3) Nothing contained in this section shall apply in relation to a search initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets requisitioned under section 132A on or after the 1st day of April, 2021.] Amendment to I-T Act’s Section 153Cto Apply to Searches Retrospectively’ The Supreme Court on 06-04-2023 held that the amendment brought to Section 153C of the Income Tax Act,1961 will apply retrospectively to searches conducted prior to June 1, 2015, the date of amendment. Setting aside the Gujarat High Court’s 2019 judgment that held to the contrary, a Bench led by Justice MR Shah, while ruling infavour of Revenue Department, said “as per the settled position of law, the courts, while interpreting machinery provisions of a taxing statute, must give effect to its manifest purpose by construing it in such a manner so as to effectuate the object andpurpose of the statute. ” “The object and purpose of Section 153C is to address the persons other than the searched person. Even as per the unamended Section 153C, the proceeding against other persons (other than the searched person) was on thebasis of the seizure of books of account or documents seized or requisitioned “belongs or belong to” a person other than the searched person,” the SC said in its 67-page judgment. However, the apex court gave liberty to the assessees to challenge the assessment orders within four weeks on any other grounds which may be available and the department can consider the same in accordance with law and on their own merits.

Assessment of income of any other person under section 153C of Income Tax Act 1961 Read More »

More than 40.82 crore loans amounting to ₹23.2 lakh crore

More than 40.82 crore loans amounting to ₹23.2 lakh crore sanctioned under Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana (PMMY) since inception The Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana (PMMY) was launched on 8th April 2015 by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi with the aim to facilitate easy collateral-free micro credit of up to ₹10 lakh to non-corporate, non-farm small and micro entrepreneurs for income generating activities. The loans under PMMY are provided by Member Lending Institutions (MLIs), i.e., Banks, Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs), Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs) and other financial intermediaries. Upon marking successful 8th anniversary of the PMMY, Union Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman said, “Brought under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, the scheme has enabled easy and hassle-free access to credit to micro-enterprises and has helped a large number of young entrepreneurs establish their businesses.” In reference to the PMMY data, Smt. Sitharaman said, “Since the launch of the scheme, as of 24.03.2023, about ₹23.2 lakh crore has been sanctioned in 40.82 crore loan accounts. About 68% of accounts under the scheme belong to women entrepreneurs and 51% of accounts belong to entrepreneurs of SC/ST and OBC categories. This demonstrates that easy availability of credit to the budding entrepreneurs of the country has led to innovation and sustained increase in per capita income.” Highlighting indigenous growth through MSMEs, the Finance Minister said, “The growth of MSMEs has contributed massively to the “Make in India” programme as strong domestic MSMEs lead to increased indigenous production both for domestic markets as well as for exports. The PMMY scheme has helped in the generation of large-scale employment opportunities at the grassroots level and also has proved to be a game changer while boosting the Indian economy.” On the occasion, Union Minister of State (MoS) for Finance Dr Bhagwat Kisanrao Karad said, “The PMMY scheme aims to provide collateral free access to credit in a seamless manner to micro enterprises in the country. It has brought the unserved and under-served sections of the society within the framework of institutional credit. The government policy of promoting MUDRA has led millions of MSME enterprises in the formal economy and has helped them to get out of the clutches of money-lenders offering very high cost funds.” As we celebrate the 8th anniversary of providing financial inclusion through the pillars of Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana (PMMY), let us glance through some of the major features and achievements of the Scheme: The implementation of financial inclusion programme in the country is based on three pillars, namely, Banking the Unbanked Securing the Unsecured and Funding the Unfunded These aforesaid three objectives are being achieved through leveraging technology and adopting multi-stakeholders’ collaborative approach, while serving the unserved and underserved as well. One of the three pillars of FI – Funding the Unfunded, is reflected in the Financial Inclusion ecosystem through PMMY, which is being implemented with the objective to provide access to credit for small entrepreneurs. Features The loans have been divided into three categories based on the need for finance and stage in maturity of the business.  These are Shishu (loans up to ₹50,000/-), Kishore (loans above ₹50,000/- and up to ₹5 lakh), and Tarun (loans above ₹5 lakh and up to ₹10 lakh).  Loans under PMMY are provided to meet both term loan and working capital components of financing for income generating activities in manufacturing, trading and service sectors, including activities allied to agriculture such as poultry, dairy, beekeeping, etc.  The rate of interest is decided by lending institutions in terms of RBI guidelines.  In case of working capital facility, interest is charged only on money held overnight by borrower. Achievements under Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY) as on 24.03.2023 More than 40.82 crore loans amounting to ₹23.2 lakh crore have been sanctioned since launch of the Scheme.  Approximately 21% of the total loans have been sanctioned to New Entrepreneurs. Approximate 69% loans of the total number of loans have been sanctioned to Women Entrepreneurs & 51% loans have been sanctioned to SC/ST/OBC categories of borrowers. Category-wise breakup:- Category No. of Loans (%) Amount Sanctioned (%) Shishu 83% 40% Kishore 15% 36% Tarun 2% 24% Total 100% 100%   Targets have been achieved since the inception of the Scheme barring F.Y. 2020-21 due to Covid-19 pandemic. Year-wise sanction amount is as follows:- Year No of Loans Sanctioned (in cr.) Amount Sanctioned (₹ Lakh crore) 2015-16 3.49 1.37 2016-17 3.97 1.80 2017-18 4.81 2.54 2018-19 5.98 3.22 2019-20 6.22 3.37 2020-21 5.07 3.22 2021-22 5.37 3.39 2022-23 (as on 24.03.2023)* 5.88 4.32 Total 40.82 23.2    *Provisional Any other relevant information Interest Subvention of 2% on prompt repayment of Shishu loans extended under PMMY for a period of 12 months to all eligible borrowers’ Announced by the Finance Minister on 14.05.2020 under Aatma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan. The Scheme was formulated as a specific response to an unprecedented situation and aimed to alleviate financial stress for borrowers at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’ by reducing their cost of credit. The Scheme was operational till 31.08.2021. ₹636.89 crore have been disbursed by SIDBI to MLIs for onward credit of subvention amount into accounts of borrowers. Credit Guarantee Fund for Micro Units (CGFMU) Credit Guarantee Fund for Micro Units was set up in January 2016 under the aegis of the National Credit Guarantee Trustee Company Ltd. (NCGTC), a wholly-owned company of Government of India, to provide guarantee to: Loans extended to eligible micro units under Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY) up to ₹10 lakh, by Banks/ Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)/ Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs)/ other financial intermediaries; Overdraft loan amount of ₹5,000 (enhanced to ₹10,000 in Sep, 2018) sanctioned under Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) accounts; and Self Help Group (SHG) portfolio between ₹10 lakh to ₹20 lakh (w.e.f. 01.04.2020).

More than 40.82 crore loans amounting to ₹23.2 lakh crore Read More »

Appeal not disposed on merits Jaipur ITAT Order

ITA. No. 387/JP/2022 PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM These two appeals are filed by the assessee aggrieved from the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [ Here in ITA Nos. 387 & 388/JP/2022 Pramod Kasliwal, Jaipur vs. ITO, Jaipur after referred as NFAC ] for the assessment year 2017-18 dated 02/09/2022 which is arising out of two separate orders. In turn one was from the order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 21/11/2019 and another for the same A.Y i.e., 2017-18 for which separate order u/s 154 of the Act dated 30/01/2020 passed by the ld. AO. Aggrieved from the orders of the ld. AO in both the matters, the assessee has preferred an appeal before ld. CIT/NFAC. Feeling aggrieved and not satisfied with the order of CIT/NFAC, the assessee has raised these appeals before us and the grounds taken are as under:-  ITA No. 387/JP/2022 “1.                   The Learned CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi, has grossly erred on facts and in law in not dealing with the Grounds of Appeal filed against AO’s Order u/s 154 of ITA dt. 30.01.20 which Order of AO in response to Rectification Application dt. 12.12.2019 by the Assessee was Summarily disposed off without any discussions on the mistakes apparent from record in the Order u/s 154 dt. 30.01.20 drawn attention to in the Rectification application viz., w.r.t. explicit claim of extended benefit of holding since the death of original owner of asset attracting Long term Capital Gains in terms of Explanation 1(b) to Sec.2(42A) read with sec. 49(1) of ITA. The learned CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi, has further erred in law in sustaining the view of the AO in passing Order u/s 154, holding that since an Appeal contesting the Order in assessment u/s 143(3) of ITA, was pre filed by the Assessee in which all the issues raised in the Rectification application were already included, the Rectification 3                                        ITA Nos. 387 & 388/JP/2022 Pramod Kasliwal, Jaipur vs. ITO, Jaipur Application was not valid and accordingly rejected. While concluding on the issue in the case, the CIT(A)’s has not appreciated the fact that both the proceedings viz., pursuant to Order u’s 143(3) and the proceedings initiated by filing a Rectification application u/s 154, have different scope, object and purpose and in peculiar cases such as the present one, both these proceedings can be contested parallelly. The learned CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi has further erred on facts as well as in law in declining to entertain the benefit of Sec. 54 of ITA pursuant to the assessee claiming Exemption only with respect to investment in cost of One Flat totaling to Rs. 1,70,50,000/- and not with reference to 5 Residential Flats, which number of Flats was only for the purposes of determination of total quantum of income under the head Long Term Capital Gains and not for the purposes of claiming Exemption benefit u/s 54 of ITA. The Appellant prays leave to add to, alter and/or amend the grounds of appeal at or before the time of hearing of appeal” ITA No. 388/JP/2022 “1.                       The Learned CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi, AO has grossly erred on facts and in law in not dealing with the Grounds of Appeal filed against AO’s Order dt. 21.11.19 u/s 143(3) of ITA and in not expressly discussing the law and the facts of the case as submitted by the Assessee more than once in the course of assessment proceedings as also vide Written Submissions made in the course of Appeal on March 6, 2021 and passing Order in appeal wrongly copying/ replicating the Appeal Order of same date (02.09.2022 in Sec. 154 proceedings). The learned CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi, has erred in fact and in law in not granting benefit of indexation in respect of the residential house asset received by inheritance from Late Father by Will and despite such undisputed fact of inheritance, denying to go by rule of law and declining benefit of Indexation from date of death of Father under given facts of the case and instead considering the period of holding from the date of Mothers death and in doing so ignoring 2. Explanation 1(b) to 2(42A) read with sec. 49(1) of ITA viz., the date of acquisition in the hands of the previous owner viz., father. And in this manner bypassing all the existing tax jurisprudence on the issue without assigning any reasons and giving finding. The learned CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi has further erred on facts as well as in law in denying the benefit of Sec. 54 of ITA pursuant to the assessee Reinvestment into ONE New Flat so being built by the Developer explicitly for self use which fact disclosed right since the 4                                        ITA Nos. 387 & 388/JP/2022 Pramod Kasliwal, Jaipur vs. ITO, Jaipur beginning and all through the proceedings, in the Development Agreement, in ITR filed and in the course of various submissions made in the assessment proceedings and without controverting such fact and giving any finding on the said facts and rather on his own considering 5 Flats total consideration to be received by the Assessee towards Assessee’s share in total construction by the builder. The learned AO has further erred in law and on facts in wrongly calculating the tax and interest payable by the assessee firm based on aforesaid wrong calculations. The Appellant prays leave to add to, alter and/or amend the grounds of appeal at or before the time of hearing of appeal.” Since the issues raised in the assessee’s appeal for both the years are almost identical and therefore, these two appeals were heard together with the agreement of both the parties and are being disposed off by this consolidated order. The fact as culled out from the records is that the assessee has filed original return of income electronically on 24.07.2017 declaring total income at Rs. 1,05,46,290/-. The assessee derive income from business and capital gain during the year under The case of assessee was selected for limited scrutiny assessment under CASS (Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection) with the reason of “1. Deduction/exemption

Appeal not disposed on merits Jaipur ITAT Order Read More »

Order for penalty for violation of section 39(4) of the Companies Act, 2013

Appointment of Adjudication Officer:- The Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its Gazette Notification No. A-42011/112/2014- Ad. II dated 24.03.2015 has appointed the undersigned as Adjudicating Officer in exercise of the powers conferred under section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 (herein after known as Act) read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 for adjudging penalties under the provisions of this Act. Company Whereas, Company Mis. Vyaysayi Bachat Evam Sakh Swarnlambi Nidhi Limited, CIN: U65990BR2015nCO23450 (herein after known as Company) is a company incorporated on 07.01.2015 under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956/2013 in the state of Bihar and having its registered office situated at Tola Utari, Singhwara Darbhanga Patna Bihar 847123, India as per MCA website. Facts about the case Whereas, during the course of inspection it has been noticed that the total number of members has been shown as 7291 in NDH-3 as on 31.03.2016 filed by the company whereas as per record maintained with this office no such return of allotment of shares to 7291 members in Form PAS -3 has been filed by the company which is required to be filed with the Registrar under provision of section 39(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. This office has issued notice under section 39 of the companies Act, 2013 to the company and its directors vide letter dated 07.03.2023, for which no reply has been received. Whereas, this office has not received any reply from the company and its directors. Hence, it appears that the provisions of Section 39(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 has been contravened by the company and its directors/officers and therefore they are liable for penalty u/s 39(5) of the Companies Act, 2013. Section 39(5) states that:- “In case of any default under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4), the company and its officer who is in default shall be liable to a penalty, for each default, of one thousand rupees for each day during which such default continues or one lakh rupees, whichever is less.”. Further Section 446B states that “if penalty is payable for non-compliance of any of the provisions of this Act by a One Person Company, small company, start-up company or Producer Company, or by any of its officer in default, or any other person in respect of such company, then such company, its officer in default or any other person, as the case may be, shall be liable to a penalty which shall not he more than one-half of the penalty specified in such provisions subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and one lakh rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person, as the case may be”. As per clause 85 of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, small company means a company whose paid up capital and turnover shall not exceed rupees four crore and rupees forty crore respectively. As per MCA portal, paid up capital of the company- Vyaysayi Bachat Evam Sakh Swarrilambi Nidhi Limited is Rs. 5,00,000 and as regard to turnover, the company has shown turnover of Rs 5,03,12,600 in the ADC-4 filed with the office for year ending 31.03.2022. Therefore, the benefits of small company is extended to this company while adjudicating penalty. Order Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, and after taking into account the factors above, I hereby impose a penalty on Company, and its Directors as per Table Below under section 39 (5) of the Act for failure in compliance of section 39 (4) of the Companies Act, 2013 Nature of default Violation of Section of the Companies Act, 2013 Company/ Officers to whom penalty imposed No. of days in default I      Penalty for defaults (Rs.) as per Section 39(5) of the Act Maximum Penalty (Rs.) Penalty Imposed (Rs.) As         per         Sec. 446B of the Act Non-filing Section 39(4) Vyaysayi Bachat 2559 2559*1000 1,00,000 50,000 of PAS-3   Evam     Sakh   =25,59,000         Swamiambi             Nidhi Limited         Non-filing Section 39(4) Shri          Anjay 2559 2559*1000 1,00,000 50,000 of PAS-3   Kumar   =25,59,000     Non-filing Section 39(4) Shri Asheshwar 2559 2559*1000 1,00,000 50,000 of PAS-3   Sahani   ,–—25,59,000     Non-filing Section 39(4) Shri         Ashok 2559 2559*1000 1,00,000 50,000 of PAS-3   Kumar Pandey   =25,59,000     Non-filing Section 39(4) Ms.         Anita 2559 2559*1000 1,00,000 50,000 of PAS-3   Kurnari   =25,59,000     Non-filing Section 39(4) Shri       Surya 2559 2559*1000 1,00,000 50,000 of PAS-3   Narayan Prasad   —25,59,000     (* No of days have been calculated from 31.03.2016 to till date of order, i.e., 03.04.2023)   The noticee shall pay the amount of penalty individually for the company and its directors (out of own pocket) by way of e-payment (available on Ministry website mca.gov.in) under “Pay miscellaneous fees” category in MCA fee and payment Services within 90 (ninety) days of this order. The Challan/ SRN generated after payment of penalty through online mode shall be forwarded to this office. Appeal against this order may be filled in writing with the Regional Director (ER), Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Kolkata, within a period of 60 (sixty) days from the date of receipt of this order, in Form AD] (available on Ministry website mca.gl_ay.in) setting forth the grounds of appeal and shall be accompanied by a certified copy of this order {Section 454(5) and 454(6) of the Act read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014}. Your attention is also invited to section 454(8) of the Act in the event of non-compliance of this order. (Aparajit Barua) Adjudicating Officer & Registrar of Companies-Cum- Official Liquidator, Patna.

Order for penalty for violation of section 39(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 Read More »